PRESS
RELEASE
November
14 , 2000
The
Pacific Forest Trust Commends Inclusion
of Forest
Carbon Sinks Credits in the Kyoto Protocol
Santa
Rosa, CA This
week, delegates from over 160 countries are gathering at
The Hague, Netherlands as part of the sixth Conference of
the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol. This meeting is particularly
significant as the Parties face the question of whether forests
should be considered in the Protocol as a means of reducing
carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and if so, how
they should be included. Loss and unsustainable management
of forests is known to be the second largest source of CO2 emissions.
The US position supports
rules for the broad inclusion of forests and other land uses
that reduce CO2 emissions. According to the United
States, such activities should be eligible for carbon credits
under the Kyoto Protocol. PFT President Laurie Wayburn commended
the USs position saying, "Done right, this is a tremendous
opportunity to reduce carbon emissions, create a new economy,
and support forest conservation."
According to Ms. Wayburn "done
right" means three things. First of all, credits for carbon
sequestration must be additional to carbon stored as a
result of business as usual. Second, forests included in carbon
accounting should be managed for the permanent sequestration
of carbon so that emissions reductions are lasting and conservation
co-benefits are realized. Finally, credits must be verified by
independent third parties.
PFTs recommendations
are further articulated in a recently released report "Forest
Carbon in the United States: Opportunities and Options for Private
Lands,"
co-authored by PFT and several leading scientists.
Inclusion of credit
for forest-based activities that reduce CO2 emissions
in the Protocol would create a new market for forest stewardship
and conservation. It would create a structure under which landowners
could be paid for keeping land in forest and for increased stewardship
of those forests. Keeping land in forest, not only reduces carbon
dioxide emissions from forest loss, but also increases sequestration
and provides numerous co-benefits to forest ecosystems such as
biodiversity and watershed conservation.
"Managing forest
for carbon by growing older forests with greater stocks of carbon
also provides more habitat for species, enhances water quality
and augments local forest economies, "said Professor John
Gordon of the Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, "This
is a win-win opportunity."
A recent press release
from The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) supports
this position saying, "Climate policies can be more economically
and environmentally effective if they are integrated into national
plans for sustainable development. Win-win policies that simultaneously
meet the objectives of more than one environmental convention
should
be encouraged as much as possible." |